Biostatistics & Research · single question

Which study design examines populations in their NATURAL environment, providing the best external validity?

  1. Field (ecological) study — observes naturally occurring exposure and disease patterns in populations
  2. Cohort study
  3. Randomized clinical trial
  4. Cross-sectional study
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Field (ecological) study — observes naturally occurring exposure and disease patterns in populations

  • A. Correct. Field studies (ecological/community studies) observe populations IN THEIR NATURAL HABITAT without intervention, maximizing external validity (generalizability). Exposure and disease data are collected at the population level. They are hypothesis-generating and useful for studying naturally occurring phenomena.
  • B. Cohort studies follow defined groups over time but may involve controlled settings — field studies specifically emphasize natural environments.
  • C. RCTs introduce an intervention under controlled conditions — the OPPOSITE of natural environment study.
  • D. Cross-sectional studies take a snapshot of exposure and disease at one time point — not specifically studying populations in their natural environment over time.

Practice Biostatistics & Research questions Biostatistics & Research study notes

More Biostatistics & Research practice questions