Endodontics · single question

In evaluating the quality of root canal obturation, which scenario is considered more clinically concerning?

  1. Slightly overfilled obturation (material 1–2 mm beyond apex)
  2. Underfilled (short) obturation leaving 3+ mm of canal unfilled
  3. Both are equally concerning
  4. Neither is clinically significant if the patient is asymptomatic
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Underfilled (short) obturation leaving 3+ mm of canal unfilled

An underfilled root canal (short obturation) is more clinically concerning than a slight overfill because it leaves residual canal space that serves as a bacterial reservoir, preventing healing of periapical pathology. Studies and long-term case series have shown that if the apical third of the canal is not sealed adequately, bacteria and their byproducts continue to cause periapical inflammation and treatment failure. A slight overfill, if the canal is properly decontaminated and a good three-dimensional seal exists at the apex, often resolves over time as extruded material is resorbed. The key determinant of endodontic success is the quality of the apical seal — not whether the material is 1–2 mm beyond the apex.

Practice Endodontics questions Endodontics study notes

More Endodontics practice questions