Ethics & Law · single question

A dental employment contract contains a restrictive covenant (non-compete) clause. Which of the following should NOT be treated as a negotiable element when judging whether the clause is valid?

  1. A reasonable geographic radius
  2. Whether it restricts patients' access to needed care
  3. A legitimate business interest being protected
  4. A reasonable duration of restriction
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Whether it restricts patients' access to needed care

  • A. Geographic scope IS a core validity test — the radius must be no larger than needed to protect the practice.
  • B. Correct — this is the element that can NEVER be traded away. Patient welfare and access to care are not bargaining chips. If a covenant impairs patients' ability to obtain treatment it is unethical and unenforceable no matter how reasonable its duration or radius. Exam strategy: in long legal stems, find the option that harms the patient.
  • C. A legitimate protectable interest (patient lists, goodwill, trade secrets) IS required for enforceability.
  • D. Duration IS a core validity test — courts strike down covenants of unreasonable length.

Practice Ethics & Law questions Ethics & Law study notes

More Ethics & Law practice questions