Ethics & Law · single question

A patient with post-traumatic stress disorder attends anxious about dental care, but the condition is not described as severe. What is the most appropriate INITIAL approach?

  1. Refer the patient for general anesthesia
  2. Explain in advance, step by step, exactly what will happen at each visit and agree a stop signal
  3. Proceed quickly and quietly so as not to draw attention to the anxiety
  4. Prescribe oral diazepam before every appointment
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Explain in advance, step by step, exactly what will happen at each visit and agree a stop signal

  • A. General anesthesia is disproportionate for non-severe anxiety and does nothing to build the tolerance needed for routine ongoing care.
  • B. CORRECT. Loss of control and unpredictability are the core triggers in PTSD, so the first-line intervention is BEHAVIOURAL: full advance explanation of what will happen, tell-show-do, a pre-agreed stop signal that you always honour, short appointments, and allowing the patient to control the pace. Predictability plus genuine control restores a sense of safety and is effective for the majority of these patients.
  • C. Working fast and saying little is precisely wrong: it maximises unpredictability and removes the patient's control, which is what provokes the response.
  • D. Pharmacological sedation may be a useful ADJUNCT if behavioural measures prove insufficient, but starting with a benzodiazepine skips the intervention that actually addresses the mechanism — and benzodiazepines carry dependence risk in a population with high comorbid substance use.

Note: Ask what specifically triggers the response — supine positioning, the mask, the sound of the handpiece, someone standing behind them, being unable to speak. Many triggers can simply be designed around once you know them.

Practice Ethics & Law questions Ethics & Law study notes

More Ethics & Law practice questions