Ethics & Law · single question

A male dentist plans to treat a female patient under intravenous sedation. Which modification is MOST appropriate?

  1. Have a second staff member present in the operatory throughout the procedure
  2. Ask the patient to sign an additional waiver
  3. No modification is required if consent was obtained
  4. Have a family member remain in the operatory
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Have a second staff member present in the operatory throughout the procedure

  • A. Correct. A sedated patient is vulnerable, has impaired recall, and may experience sexual fantasy or distorted perception as a documented effect of sedative agents. The standard of care — and the protection for both patient and practitioner — is a CHAPERONE: an appropriately trained staff member present continuously from administration until full recovery and discharge. This also serves the clinical need for a dedicated monitor.
  • B. A waiver does not substitute for a chaperone and would not protect either party from an allegation.
  • C. Consent addresses the procedure itself. It does not eliminate the risk of misperception under sedation or the need for continuous monitoring by a second trained person.
  • D. Family members are untrained, cannot assist in an emergency, and their presence in the operatory during sedation is generally not appropriate; a trained staff member is required.

Practice Ethics & Law questions Ethics & Law study notes

More Ethics & Law practice questions