Ethics & Law · patient case question

A different patient arrives for a scheduled intravenous sedation appointment smelling strongly of marijuana. What should the dentist do?

Patient case: Anxious adult with a traumatic dental history

Patient: Male, 44 years old

Chief Complaint: Needs restorative treatment but is visibly frightened.

Background: He describes a previous dentist who treated him without adequate anaesthesia and, when he complained of pain, told him to stop crying like a baby. He has avoided dental care for eleven years.

Current Findings: Tense, tearful, hyperventilating slightly on sitting in the chair. Multiple untreated carious lesions.

  1. Proceed but reduce the sedative dose
  2. Proceed as planned, since marijuana does not interact with sedatives
  3. Proceed with local anaesthesia only
  4. Reschedule the appointment
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Reschedule the appointment

  • A. Dose reduction does not resolve the unpredictability of the interaction, and it does not address the consent problem at all.
  • B. Marijuana emphatically does interact with sedatives — additive CNS depression and cardiovascular effects are both well documented.
  • C. Abandoning the sedation but proceeding with treatment still leaves an intoxicated patient who cannot consent, and elective care under those circumstances is not defensible.
  • D. CORRECT. Recent cannabis use interacts unpredictably with intravenous sedatives — it potentiates CNS depression, alters the dose response, and raises the risk of tachycardia and dysrhythmia when combined with anaesthetic agents. Beyond the pharmacology, an intoxicated patient cannot give valid informed consent. Reschedule, and explain clearly why.

Practice Ethics & Law questions Ethics & Law study notes

More Ethics & Law practice questions