Ethics & Law · single question

You strongly suspect a lesion is malignant and have referred the patient for biopsy. What is the MOST appropriate way to explain this to the patient?

  1. Say nothing about your concern and simply arrange the referral
  2. Reassure the patient that it is almost certainly not cancer so as not to cause alarm
  3. State definitively that it is cancer and that emergency treatment is needed
  4. Explain that the lesion is concerning and could be cancer, and that a biopsy is required to determine what it is
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Explain that the lesion is concerning and could be cancer, and that a biopsy is required to determine what it is

  • A. Silent referral leaves the patient without the information needed to appreciate urgency, and patients who do not understand why they are being referred frequently do not attend.
  • B. False reassurance is a breach of veracity. It may cause the patient to delay or skip the biopsy, and it destroys trust when the diagnosis returns positive.
  • C. Declaring cancer before histological confirmation is factually wrong — clinical impression is not diagnosis — and inflicts avoidable distress. Many clinically alarming lesions prove benign.
  • D. CORRECT. This response is both HONEST and ACCURATE about the limits of current knowledge. It conveys the seriousness of the concern — which the patient needs in order to keep the appointment and understand the urgency — without asserting a diagnosis that has not yet been established histologically. It preserves veracity, supports informed decision-making, and leaves room for the genuine possibility of a benign result.

Note: The communication principle: be honest about your level of concern AND honest about your uncertainty. Follow up actively to confirm the patient attended, rather than assuming the referral closed the loop.

Practice Ethics & Law questions Ethics & Law study notes

More Ethics & Law practice questions