Periodontics · patient case question

Which adjunct is most appropriate alongside scaling and root planing in a patient with very deep pockets confined to molars and incisors?

Patient case: Patient with a mucopolysaccharidosis requiring periodontal treatment

Patient: Adult with a diagnosed mucopolysaccharidosis

Chief complaint: Referred for scaling and root planing of the lower anterior teeth.

Background: Mucopolysaccharidosis (a lysosomal storage disorder). Otherwise cooperative.

Current findings: Periodontal status is otherwise normal. Treatment required is limited to scaling and root planing of the lower anterior segment.

  1. Chlorhexidine rinse alone
  2. No adjunct is ever indicated
  3. Locally delivered minocycline microspheres
  4. Systemic tetracycline for six weeks
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Locally delivered minocycline microspheres

  • A. Chlorhexidine rinse does not reach the base of a deep pocket — it penetrates only 1–2 mm subgingivally.
  • B. Adjuncts are genuinely indicated in selected sites that fail to respond to mechanical therapy alone.
  • C. Best answer for LOCALISED deep pockets. Site-specific local delivery (minocycline microspheres, doxycycline gel, chlorhexidine chips) places a high antimicrobial concentration exactly where it is needed, without systemic exposure. A molar-and-incisor distribution is the classic localised pattern.
  • D. Prolonged systemic tetracycline carries resistance, gastrointestinal and photosensitivity burdens, and is reserved for generalised aggressive disease.

Note: The molar–incisor pattern should prompt you to consider what used to be called localised aggressive periodontitis, associated with Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans.

Practice Periodontics questions Periodontics study notes

More Periodontics practice questions