Restorative & Materials · patient case question

The configuration factor (C-factor) of a cavity preparation refers to:

Patient case: Erosion in a High-Acid Diet

demo: 27-year-old female

chief: “My back teeth feel notched and everything is sensitive.”

history: Consumes 5–7 whole lemons daily. Reports nocturnal bruxism. No reflux, no purging behavior.

meds: None

findings: Cupped, smooth, glossy defects on the occlusal surfaces of the posterior teeth with amalgam restorations standing proud of the surrounding enamel. Generalized dentin hypersensitivity.

  1. The ratio of filler to resin matrix in the composite
  2. The ratio of bonded to unbonded surfaces — a higher ratio produces greater polymerization shrinkage stress
  3. The ratio of enamel to dentin at the cavosurface margin
  4. The ratio of depth to width of the preparation
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. The ratio of bonded to unbonded surfaces — a higher ratio produces greater polymerization shrinkage stress

  • A. Filler loading affects shrinkage magnitude but is a material property, not the C-factor.
  • B. Correct. C-factor is bonded surfaces divided by unbonded (free) surfaces. Fewer free surfaces means less opportunity for the composite to flow during curing, so shrinkage stress concentrates at the bond — which is why a Class I preparation has the highest C-factor and a Class IV the lowest.
  • C. The enamel-to-dentin ratio affects bond quality but is a different concept.
  • D. Depth-to-width ratio describes preparation geometry generally, not the configuration factor.

Note: The source wording for this item was garbled. The definition above is the accepted one; incremental layering and flowable liners are the standard means of reducing C-factor stress.

Practice Restorative & Materials questions Restorative & Materials study notes

More Restorative & Materials practice questions