Ethics & Law · patient case question

How should the dentist respond to the request for veneers?

Patient case: A Teenager, His Mother, and a Language Barrier

Patient: 14-year-old male, accompanied by his mother

Chief Complaint: “I don't like how my teeth look. I want veneers.”

Background: Orthodontic treatment completed six months ago. His mother speaks only Spanish and the dentist speaks only English. The mother has brought her 16-year-old nephew along, offering to have him interpret.

Medications: None

Vital Signs: BP 108/66 mmHg · HR 76 bpm · RR 16 · T 98.4°F

Findings: Class I occlusion with an excellent post-orthodontic result. Teeth are well aligned, intact, unrestored and caries-free. Shade and morphology are within normal limits. No wear, no discoloration.

  1. Discuss the risks and benefits of veneers, including the irreversible tooth reduction, and explore what specifically he dislikes
  2. Decline and tell him to return when he is 18
  3. Place composite veneers as the more conservative option
  4. Refer him back to the orthodontist for re-evaluation
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Discuss the risks and benefits of veneers, including the irreversible tooth reduction, and explore what specifically he dislikes

  • A. CORRECT. The teeth are sound and the alignment is excellent, so there is no clinical indication. But dismissing the request outright misses the point — the appropriate response is an informed discussion. Veneers require IRREVERSIBLE enamel reduction on healthy teeth, commit a 14-year-old to a lifetime of replacements, and are being requested at an age when the gingival margins have not yet stabilised. Understanding what he actually dislikes often reveals a concern that whitening, minor reshaping or simply reassurance can address.
  • B. A flat refusal without explanation abandons the patient's concern and damages trust. His autonomy is exercised THROUGH information, not by withholding it.
  • C. Choosing a material without first establishing whether ANY restorative intervention is justified reverses the order of reasoning. Composite is more conservative, but 'less harmful' is not the same as 'indicated'.
  • D. The orthodontic result is described as excellent. Referring back offers nothing and implicitly frames a normal outcome as a failure.

Note: Elective irreversible treatment on a healthy dentition in an adolescent deserves particular caution. Cosmetic dissatisfaction at this age frequently resolves; enamel does not grow back.

Practice Ethics & Law questions Ethics & Law study notes

More Ethics & Law practice questions