Prosthodontics & Occlusion · patient case question

Given her periodontal status, which design modification best reduces torquing forces on the abutment adjacent to the distal extension?

Patient case: Attachment-Retained Partial Denture

Patient: 47-year-old female

Chief Complaint: “I don’t want a metal clasp showing when I smile.”

Background: Missing #18, #19, and #20 on the left with a dentate right side — a mandibular Kennedy Class II arch. Generalized moderate chronic periodontitis, currently stable after non-surgical therapy: probing depths 3–5 mm, no bleeding on probing, grade I mobility on the abutments.

Medications: None

Vital Signs: BP 118/74 mmHg · HR 70 bpm · RR 16 · T 98.6°F

Findings: An attachment-retained removable partial denture is planned, using an intracoronal (precision) attachment within a splinted crown on #21 rather than an extracoronal clasp. A radiograph of an existing prosthesis on the contralateral side shows a radiopaque box-and-key interface between a retainer and an adjacent unit.

  1. Place the occlusal rest in the mesial fossa rather than the distal fossa
  2. Move the rest from the mesial to the distal fossa
  3. Convert the attachment to a rigid connection
  4. Eliminate the occlusal rest on that abutment
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Place the occlusal rest in the mesial fossa rather than the distal fossa

  • A. Correct. A mesial rest shifts the fulcrum line away from the distal extension. When the base is loaded, the framework rotates about the mesial rest and the retentive arm moves into a non-retentive area rather than being levered against the abutment. This is the core stress-releasing principle behind the RPI and RPA systems.
  • B. Incorrect. A distal rest places the fulcrum immediately adjacent to the extension base, so functional loading levers the abutment distally — exactly the destructive torque to be avoided in a periodontally involved tooth.
  • C. Incorrect. A rigid connection transmits the full displacement of the extension base directly to the abutment, maximizing rather than minimizing torque.
  • D. Incorrect. Removing the rest allows the framework to settle into the gingival tissues, causing soft tissue trauma and losing all vertical support and load direction.

Note: The RPI system — mesial Rest, distal Proximal plate, I-bar — is designed specifically for distal extension cases. On rotation, all three components disengage from the abutment rather than binding against it.

Practice Prosthodontics & Occlusion questions Prosthodontics & Occlusion study notes

More Prosthodontics & Occlusion practice questions