Radiology · patient case question

For the well-defined radiolucency between the roots of the maxillary central incisors, all of the following belong in the differential EXCEPT:

Patient case: Ossifying Fibroma and Anterior Maxillary Radiolucency

demo: 31-year-old female

chief: Asymptomatic lesion noted on routine imaging.

history: Non-contributory.

meds: None

findings: A well-circumscribed lesion of mixed density is present in the posterior mandible (images below). On a separate periapical film of the maxillary central incisors, a well-defined radiolucency is seen between the roots of #8 and #9.

  1. Odontogenic keratocyst
  2. Buccal bifurcation cyst
  3. Normal anatomy — the incisive foramen
  4. Nasopalatine duct cyst
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Buccal bifurcation cyst

  • A. An OKC can occur anywhere in the jaws and is a legitimate, if less likely, differential.
  • B. Correct — this is the exception. A buccal bifurcation cyst is an inflammatory cyst on the buccal aspect of an erupting mandibular first or second molar in a child. It has no relationship to the anterior maxilla.
  • C. A prominent incisive foramen is normal anatomy and is the first thing to exclude before treating.
  • D. The nasopalatine duct cyst is the most common non-odontogenic cyst of the jaws and sits exactly here, classically heart-shaped.

Note: The practical rule: an incisive foramen wider than about 6 mm, or one that enlarges over time or is symptomatic, moves from normal variant toward nasopalatine duct cyst.

Practice Radiology questions Radiology study notes

More Radiology practice questions