Ethics & Law · single question

An Ellis Class 1 fracture (enamel only) patient requests extraction and implant placement. The dentist believes this is excessive treatment. Which ethical conflict does this BEST represent?

  1. Veracity vs. autonomy
  2. Beneficence vs. justice
  3. Autonomy vs. non-maleficence
  4. Justice vs. beneficence
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Autonomy vs. non-maleficence

  • A. Veracity (honesty) is not the primary concern when the patient is making an autonomous but potentially harmful choice.
  • B. While beneficence is relevant, the core conflict is autonomy vs. non-maleficence — the patient wants something the dentist believes causes unnecessary harm.
  • C. Correct. The patient's right to decide their own treatment (autonomy) conflicts with the dentist's duty to avoid unnecessary harm (non-maleficence). Extracting a tooth with a simple enamel fracture when no other treatment is necessary would be overly aggressive and potentially harmful.
  • D. Justice (fair resource distribution) and beneficence (acting in the patient's best interest) are not the primary ethical tension here.

Practice Ethics & Law questions Ethics & Law study notes

More Ethics & Law practice questions