Biostatistics & Research · single question

A study evaluates the relationship between Vitamin A deficiency and periodontitis, reporting: OR = 1.8, CI = 1.5–7.5, p < 0.0001. How should this be interpreted?

  1. Weak association, statistically significant
  2. Strong association, not statistically significant
  3. Weak association, not statistically significant
  4. Strong association, statistically significant
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Weak association, statistically significant

  • A. OR = 1.8 is a WEAK association (not strongly elevated; compare: OR >5 = strong). However, the CI (1.5–7.5) does not cross 1, and p < 0.0001 confirms STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE. Therefore: weak association, statistically significant. ✓
  • B. The result IS statistically significant — 'not statistically significant' is incorrect.
  • C. The association IS statistically significant (p < 0.0001, CI does not cross 1) — so 'not significant' is incorrect.
  • D. An OR of 1.8 suggests an 80% increased odds — this is a WEAK to moderate association (OR >3–4 = strong). Despite the statistical significance, the magnitude of effect is modest.

Practice Biostatistics & Research questions Biostatistics & Research study notes

More Biostatistics & Research practice questions