Pathology · single question

A 27-year-old woman who is NOT pregnant had a gingival swelling excised; it has now recurred. The original histology showed proliferating vascular tissue. Most likely diagnosis?

  1. Peripheral ossifying fibroma
  2. Pyogenic granuloma
  3. Peripheral giant cell granuloma
  4. Irritation fibroma
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Pyogenic granuloma

  • A. A peripheral ossifying fibroma contains mineralized product — bone or cementum-like material — within a fibrous stroma, not a purely vascular proliferation.
  • B. CORRECT. A pyogenic granuloma is a reactive proliferation of granulation tissue — lobular capillary hemangioma histologically — presenting as a soft, red, readily bleeding gingival mass. It is well known for recurring after excision, particularly when the local irritant is not removed or the excision does not extend to periosteum.
  • C. A peripheral giant cell granuloma also recurs and also arises on gingiva, but its histology shows multinucleated giant cells in a fibrous stroma, and it is typically more blue-purple. The stem specifies vascular proliferative tissue.
  • D. An irritation fibroma is a firm, pale, collagenous nodule with little vascularity and rarely recurs if the irritant is removed.

Note: Recurrence is almost always a technique or aetiology problem rather than tumour biology. Excise down to periosteum, scale the adjacent root surfaces thoroughly, and remove the source of irritation — overhanging margin, calculus, orthodontic appliance. Pregnancy-associated lesions may be observed until postpartum, but this patient is not pregnant, so definitive excision is appropriate.

Practice Pathology questions Pathology study notes

More Pathology practice questions