Ethics & Law · single question

A 21-year-old patient attends with his mother, who will be paying for his treatment. She asks about the plan and its costs. What is the correct approach?

  1. Discuss the fees with the mother but withhold all clinical information from the patient
  2. Discuss everything freely with the mother, since she is paying
  3. Discuss the treatment and fees with the mother only after obtaining the patient's consent to share his information
  4. Refuse to discuss anything with the mother under any circumstances
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Discuss the treatment and fees with the mother only after obtaining the patient's consent to share his information

  • A. Withholding information from the patient himself inverts the entire principle.
  • B. Payment does not create a right of access to another adult's health information.
  • C. CORRECT. At 21 the patient is a legally competent ADULT and holds his own right to confidentiality under HIPAA and to autonomous decision-making. Who pays the bill does not confer a right to protected health information. The correct step is to ask the patient — ideally in a moment alone — whether he authorizes disclosure to his mother, then document that authorization. In practice most patients agree readily, but the permission must come from the patient.
  • D. A blanket refusal is unnecessary and unhelpful — the patient may fully consent, and family involvement often improves care.

Note: The rule generalizes: spouses, adult children, and employers all require the patient's authorization before disclosure.

Practice Ethics & Law questions Ethics & Law study notes

More Ethics & Law practice questions