Endodontics · patient case with 3 questions

The Betel Quid Chewer

Patient: 44-year-old male

Chief Complaint: “One of my front teeth is much darker than the others.”

Background: Emigrated from South Asia. Chews betel quid daily for over twenty years. History of trauma to the upper front teeth in his twenties.

Medications: None

Vital Signs: BP 130/82 mmHg · HR 76 bpm · RR 16 · T 98.4°F

Findings: Generalized reddish-brown extrinsic staining of the dentition and mucosa. Gingival recession. Tooth #8 is uniformly grey-brown from within — clearly different in character from the surface staining — and did not respond to pulp testing. Root canal treatment on #8 has just been completed. The crown is otherwise intact with no caries and no restoration.

Question 1

All of the following are effects of chronic betel (areca) nut chewing EXCEPT:

  1. Gingival recession
  2. Extrinsic staining of teeth and mucosa
  3. Xerostomia
  4. Oral submucous fibrosis
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Xerostomia

  • A. This IS an effect. The abrasive quid and the slaked lime cause mechanical and chemical irritation at the site where it is habitually parked, producing localized recession and mucosal ulceration.
  • B. This IS an effect. The reddish-brown to black staining of teeth, gingiva and mucosa is the most visible sign and is the reason chewers are sometimes said to have 'betel-stained' mouths.
  • C. CORRECT — this is the EXCEPTION. Areca nut contains ARECOLINE, a muscarinic agonist, which STIMULATES salivary secretion. Chewers characteristically have increased salivation and expectorate frequently. Xerostomia is the opposite of what occurs.
  • D. This IS an effect, and the most serious. Arecoline stimulates fibroblast collagen production, producing OSMF: progressive blanching, palpable fibrous bands, burning on spicy food and eventually trismus. It is a potentially malignant disorder with a malignant transformation rate around 7–13%.

Note: Areca nut is an IARC Group 1 human carcinogen in its own right, with or without tobacco. Screen these patients carefully at every visit — palpate for fibrous bands and measure maximum opening.

Permanent page for this question

Question 2

Tooth #8 has now been root treated. What is the MOST CONSERVATIVE way to improve its appearance?

  1. External bleaching of the whole arch
  2. A porcelain veneer
  3. A full-coverage crown
  4. Internal (non-vital, walking) bleaching
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Internal (non-vital, walking) bleaching

  • A. External bleaching acts on the outer enamel and will lighten the ADJACENT teeth as much as or more than the affected one — the discrepancy can actually widen. It also does nothing for staining that originates within the dentine.
  • B. A veneer requires irreversible facial enamel reduction and may still show the dark substrate through the porcelain without an opaquer. It is a reasonable fallback if bleaching fails.
  • C. A crown removes the most tooth structure of any option and is not justified for a discoloured but otherwise INTACT crown. Reserve it for teeth that have lost substantial structure.
  • D. CORRECT. This is intrinsic discoloration from pulpal haemorrhage products within the dentine of a SINGLE non-vital tooth. INTERNAL BLEACHING places the bleaching agent (sodium perborate with water, or carbamide peroxide) inside the pulp chamber, sealed under a temporary, and is refreshed every few days until the shade matches. It removes no tooth structure at all, which makes it the most conservative option by a wide margin. Success rates for traumatically discoloured non-vital teeth are high.

Note: Before internal bleaching, place a barrier — 2 mm of glass ionomer or RMGI over the gutta-percha at a level 1 mm apical to the CEJ. This is the single step that prevents external cervical resorption.

Permanent page for this question

Question 3

If that cervical barrier is omitted and the root filling is not properly sealed before internal bleaching, what is the characteristic complication?

  1. Apical resorption
  2. Ankylosis
  3. External cervical resorption
  4. Internal resorption
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. External cervical resorption

  • A. Apical resorption relates to orthodontic force, periapical inflammation or trauma, not to a coronal bleaching agent.
  • B. Ankylosis is the fusion of root to bone following loss of the periodontal ligament, typically after avulsion or severe luxation — an entirely different mechanism.
  • C. CORRECT. EXTERNAL CERVICAL (invasive) RESORPTION is the recognised complication. Bleaching agent — particularly heated 30% hydrogen peroxide — diffuses through the dentinal tubules and out through the patent tubules at the cementoenamel junction, where the cemental covering is thin or absent in a substantial proportion of teeth. The resulting inflammation in the periodontal ligament initiates a clastic resorptive lesion at the cervical level, which is often silent until it is advanced.
  • D. Internal resorption originates from the PULP and requires vital pulp tissue and odontoclasts within the canal. This tooth has no pulp.

Note: Two protective measures: the cervical barrier described above, and avoiding the heated thermocatalytic technique. Sodium perborate with water in a sealed chamber is both safer and effective.

Permanent page for this question

Practice patient cases Endodontics study notes