Prosthodontics & Occlusion · patient case with 5 questions
Removable Partial Denture Design
demo: 64-year-old male
chief: “I want to replace my back teeth on both sides.”
history: Has not attended a dentist in several years. Reports dry mouth.
meds: Amitriptyline, hydrochlorothiazide
findings: Mandibular arch missing #17–19 and #30–32 bilaterally, with all anterior teeth present. Generalized marginal inflammation and heavy calculus. Xerostomia. No frank cavitated lesions found today.
Question 1
This mandibular arch is classified as:
Show answer and explanation
Correct answer: D. Kennedy Class I
- A. Class II is a unilateral edentulous area posterior to the remaining teeth.
- B. Class III is a unilateral edentulous area with natural teeth both anterior and posterior to it.
- C. Class IV is a single edentulous area crossing the midline, anterior to the remaining teeth.
- D. Correct. Bilateral edentulous areas posterior to the remaining natural teeth define Kennedy Class I — a bilateral distal extension case.
Question 2
What is the primary function of the lingual bar major connector in this design?
Show answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. To provide rigidity, so that forces are distributed among the supporting structures
- A. Correct. Rigidity is the defining requirement of any major connector. Without it, forces concentrate on individual abutments instead of being distributed across the arch.
- B. Vertical support comes principally from rests on the abutment teeth and, in a distal extension, from the residual ridge.
- C. Indirect retention comes from rests placed on the opposite side of the fulcrum line, not from the connector itself.
- D. Direct retention is supplied by the clasp assemblies, not the major connector.
Question 3
Applying the ADA caries risk assessment to this patient — no cavitated lesions today, but heavy calculus, gingival inflammation, xerostomia, and years without care — he is classified as:
Show answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. High caries risk
- A. Correct. Caries risk assessment is prospective. Xerostomia, heavy plaque and calculus, and irregular dental attendance are strong risk indicators that place him in the high-risk category regardless of today's cavity count.
- B. Moderate risk would apply with fewer or milder risk factors; xerostomia alone is a powerful driver toward high risk.
- C. Low risk requires good hygiene, adequate salivary flow, regular care, and no recent caries experience.
- D. Risk assessment is a clinical judgment made from history and examination; radiographs refine but do not gate it.
Question 4
The patient later receives an implant-retained mandibular overdenture. What is the accepted minimum number of implants, and where are they optimally placed?
Show answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Two implants, positioned in the canine regions
- A. Correct. Two implants in the canine regions is the accepted minimum for a mandibular overdenture — the canine sites offer good bone volume, sit anterior to the mental foramen, and give favorable attachment spacing.
- B. Four implants is the accepted minimum for a maxillary overdenture, where bone quality is poorer.
- C. A single implant is not a recognized standard of care for an overdenture.
- D. Six implants exceeds what is needed for a mandibular overdenture, though it may be used for a fixed prosthesis.
Question 5
For a maxillary implant-retained overdenture, what is the accepted minimum number of implants?
Show answer and explanation
Correct answer: D. Four
- A. Two implants is the mandibular minimum; in the maxilla it is generally considered insufficient.
- B. Six implants is common for a fixed maxillary prosthesis but exceeds the overdenture minimum.
- C. Three is not a recognized standard for a maxillary overdenture.
- D. Correct. Maxillary bone is less dense and the arch must resist greater lateral loading, so four implants is the accepted minimum.
Practice patient cases Prosthodontics & Occlusion study notes