Pathology · patient case with 2 questions

Multiple jaw radiolucencies in a patient with recurrent skin cancers

Patient: Female, 26 years old

Chief Complaint: “My dentist saw some dark areas on my x-ray.”

Background: Chart records excision of FOUR basal cell carcinomas from the face and trunk since age 19. Chest imaging previously reported a BIFID RIB. Frontal bossing and hypertelorism noted. Mother had similar skin lesions.

Vital Signs: BP 116/70 mmHg · HR 74 bpm

Findings: Panoramic radiograph shows MULTIPLE well-defined, corticated MULTILOCULAR radiolucencies in the posterior body and ramus of the mandible bilaterally, and one in the maxilla. Minimal buccolingual expansion for the size of the lesions. Palmar pitting is present.

Question 1

What are the jaw lesions most likely to be?

  1. Multiple odontogenic keratocysts
  2. Multiple dentigerous cysts
  3. Multiple radicular cysts
  4. Cherubism
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Multiple odontogenic keratocysts

  • A. CORRECT. MULTIPLE ODONTOGENIC KERATOCYSTS are the jaw manifestation of this syndrome and are often the presenting feature. They arise from the epithelial rests of Serres (dental lamina remnants), grow ANTERO-POSTERIORLY along the marrow space with little expansion — which is why the radiolucencies look large for the amount of clinical swelling — and they carry a high recurrence rate from satellite cysts and a friable lining. Enucleation with peripheral ostectomy or Carnoy solution, and long-term radiographic review, are standard.
  • B. A dentigerous cyst surrounds the CROWN of an UNERUPTED tooth and attaches at its cementoenamel junction. It is unilocular and, most importantly, is defined by its relationship to a tooth — multiple such cysts are not the pattern here.
  • C. A radicular cyst is inflammatory, arises at the apex of a NON-VITAL tooth from the rests of Malassez, and would require multiple non-vital teeth to explain multiple lesions. Nothing in the findings supports pulpal disease.
  • D. Cherubism is a bilateral, symmetric, painless multilocular expansion of the POSTERIOR MANDIBLE in a young child, producing a full-cheeked appearance that regresses after puberty. It has no association with basal cell carcinoma or rib anomaly.

Note: What these two items add is the syndrome as the STEM — recognising it from the pattern and knowing what to do next. Nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome is autosomal dominant, caused by PTCH1 mutation on chromosome 9q. Features: multiple basal cell carcinomas, multiple odontogenic keratocysts, palmar and plantar pitting, calcified falx cerebri, bifid or splayed ribs, frontal bossing, hypertelorism, and medulloblastoma risk in childhood.

Permanent page for this question

Question 2

To which two specialists is referral most appropriate?

  1. Periodontics, and endodontics
  2. Prosthodontics, and orthodontics
  3. Paediatric dentistry, and oral medicine
  4. Oral and maxillofacial surgery, and dermatology
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Oral and maxillofacial surgery, and dermatology

  • A. Periodontics and endodontics treat conditions this patient does not have. The lesions are developmental odontogenic cysts, not inflammatory lesions of pulpal or periodontal origin.
  • B. Prosthodontic and orthodontic input may eventually be needed if teeth are lost with the cysts, but neither addresses either active disease.
  • C. Paediatric dentistry is not applicable at 26, and while oral medicine may co-manage, it does not replace surgical enucleation or dermatologic oncology care.
  • D. CORRECT. The two active disease processes are the JAW CYSTS and the SKIN CANCERS. ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY manages enucleation of the keratocysts and the long-term surveillance they require, and DERMATOLOGY manages the basal cell carcinomas and screens for new ones — lifelong, since these patients develop them continuously and must avoid sun and, critically, IONISING RADIATION, which accelerates BCC formation. Genetic counselling for an autosomal dominant condition is the third strand.

Note: The radiation caution is the practically important point for a dentist: minimise radiographic exposure in these patients, use the fastest receptors and rectangular collimation, and avoid CT where an alternative exists — but do not abandon the surveillance imaging the keratocysts genuinely need. It is a balance, not a prohibition.

Permanent page for this question

Practice patient cases Pathology study notes