Pathology · patient case with 2 questions

Incidental radiographic finding on a routine panoramic

Patient: Male, 26 years old

Chief Complaint: Attends for a routine check-up. No symptoms whatsoever.

Background: No relevant medical history. Has never had a panoramic radiograph before.

Current Findings: The panoramic shows tooth #17 retained and impacted against tooth #18. A well-defined unilocular radiolucency with a corticated border surrounds the crown of #17, attaching at the cementoenamel junction. There is no root resorption of adjacent teeth and no cortical expansion.

Question 1

What is the MOST likely diagnosis?

  1. Cementoblastoma
  2. Dentigerous (follicular) cyst
  3. Radicular (periapical) cyst
  4. Periapical cemento-osseous dysplasia
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Dentigerous (follicular) cyst

  • A. A cementoblastoma is a RADIOPAQUE mass fused to a root, surrounded by a thin radiolucent rim, usually on a mandibular first molar and usually painful.
  • B. CORRECT. A dentigerous cyst develops from the reduced enamel epithelium of an unerupted tooth. Its defining radiographic feature is a well-corticated unilocular radiolucency enveloping the CROWN and attaching at the CEMENTOENAMEL JUNCTION. Impacted third molars and maxillary canines are the classic sites. It is the second most common odontogenic cyst.
  • C. A radicular cyst is INFLAMMATORY, arising at the apex of a NON-VITAL erupted tooth from the epithelial rests of Malassez. It is never associated with the crown of an impacted tooth.
  • D. Periapical cemento-osseous dysplasia occurs at the apices of VITAL mandibular anterior teeth and evolves from radiolucent to mixed to radiopaque. It needs no treatment and is not pericoronal.

Note: ⚑ The differential that must always be voiced: a UNICYSTIC AMELOBLASTOMA is radiographically indistinguishable from a dentigerous cyst, and an ODONTOGENIC KERATOCYST can present the same way. Histopathological examination of the enucleated specimen is mandatory — the radiograph alone never makes this diagnosis.

Permanent page for this question

Question 2

On a different patient's routine panoramic, a large destructive lesion is discovered in the ramus of the mandible. The patient has no symptoms. What is the appropriate action?

  1. Reassure the patient and review in twelve months
  2. Take a periapical radiograph of the area and take no further action
  3. Prescribe antibiotics and reassess in two weeks
  4. Refer to an oral and maxillofacial surgeon
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Refer to an oral and maxillofacial surgeon

  • A. Watchful waiting on an undiagnosed destructive lesion allows continued growth and, if it is neoplastic, a worse outcome and more extensive surgery.
  • B. A periapical film cannot capture a ramus lesion adequately and does nothing to establish a diagnosis.
  • C. Antibiotics treat infection. There is nothing here to suggest an infective aetiology, and a trial of antibiotics simply delays diagnosis.
  • D. CORRECT. A large lesion in the ramus is outside the scope of general practice and needs specialist assessment — advanced imaging, biopsy and definitive management. The absence of symptoms is not reassuring; many significant jaw lesions, including ameloblastoma and other neoplasms, grow silently until they are large. Referral is prompt regardless.

Permanent page for this question

Practice patient cases Pathology study notes