Prosthodontics & Occlusion · patient case with 3 questions

Aesthetics, preparation taper and post-endodontic restoration

Scenario: Three restorative items.

Question 1

Which material is most aesthetic for an anterior crown?

  1. Monolithic zirconia
  2. Full gold
  3. Lithium disilicate
  4. Porcelain fused to metal
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Lithium disilicate

  • A. Monolithic zirconia is very strong but comparatively opaque. Newer high-translucency formulations have narrowed the gap without closing it.
  • B. Gold has excellent mechanical properties and biocompatibility but is obviously unacceptable aesthetically in the anterior region.
  • C. Correct. Lithium disilicate combines high translucency with adequate strength for the anterior region, and its optical behaviour closely mimics natural enamel.
  • D. Porcelain fused to metal is limited by the opaque metal substructure, which blocks light transmission and can produce a grey line at the margin as the gingiva recedes.

Permanent page for this question

Question 2

Increasing the taper of a crown preparation adversely affects all of the following EXCEPT:

  1. Retention
  2. Resistance form
  3. Marginal adaptation
  4. Aesthetics
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Aesthetics

  • A. Retention falls sharply as taper increases; the near-parallel walls are what resist removal along the path of insertion.
  • B. Resistance form also suffers. A tapered preparation offers less opposition to obliquely directed forces that would tip the restoration off.
  • C. Excessive taper worsens marginal fit and increases the cement film thickness at the margin.
  • D. Correct — this is the exception. Aesthetics is governed by the material, the margin design and the space available for porcelain, not by the convergence angle of the axial walls.

Note: The accepted optimum is about 6 to 10 degrees of total convergence. Too little taper risks undercuts and difficulty seating.

Permanent page for this question

Question 3

A previously unrestored tooth has just had root canal treatment through a conservative access. How should it be restored?

  1. Core build-up and a full-coverage crown, without a post
  2. A post, core and crown
  3. A ceramic inlay
  4. A glass ionomer restoration alone
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Core build-up and a full-coverage crown, without a post

  • A. Correct. With the coronal walls intact, there is ample structure to retain a core. A post would only remove sound dentine and raise the risk of root fracture, while cuspal coverage protects a tooth that has lost its proprioceptive feedback and much of its moisture.
  • B. A post is indicated only when insufficient coronal tooth structure remains to retain the core. It adds no strength to the root — it is purely a retentive device.
  • C. An inlay does not provide cuspal coverage, so it leaves an endodontically treated posterior tooth vulnerable to fracture.
  • D. Glass ionomer alone is far too weak to withstand occlusal load on a root-treated tooth in the long term.

Note: Anterior teeth with conservative access and intact walls can often be restored with composite alone — the crown-for-everything rule applies mainly to posterior teeth.

Permanent page for this question

Practice patient cases Prosthodontics & Occlusion study notes