Pediatric Dentistry · patient case with 1 question

8-year-old with a history of lip biting after treatment

Scenario: An 8-year-old boy needs a restoration on tooth #T. He has a PREVIOUS HISTORY OF LIP BITING after treatment. Which anaesthetic technique is more effective and appropriate?

Question 1

Which anesthetic approach is most appropriate?

  1. 3% mepivacaine (Carbocaine) plain by infiltration
  2. Inferior alveolar nerve block with 2% lidocaine and 1:100,000 epinephrine
  3. Inferior alveolar nerve block with bupivacaine
  4. Long buccal block with articaine
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. 3% mepivacaine (Carbocaine) plain by infiltration

  • A. Correct. 3% MEPIVACAINE PLAIN has NO vasoconstrictor and therefore the SHORTEST soft-tissue duration of the common dental anaesthetics — roughly 2-3 hours of soft tissue numbness rather than 3-5 hours. Combined with an INFILTRATION rather than a block, this minimises the duration and extent of lip and tongue numbness in a child with a documented self-injury history.
  • B. A conventional block with lidocaine and epinephrine produces the LONGEST soft-tissue anaesthesia — precisely the scenario that led to the previous lip biting.
  • C. Bupivacaine is a LONG-acting agent (up to 8-12 hours of soft tissue anaesthesia) and is contraindicated in young children for exactly this reason.
  • D. A long buccal block anaesthetises buccal soft tissue only and would not provide pulpal anaesthesia for the restoration.

Note: Also consider PHENTOLAMINE MESYLATE (OraVerse) to reverse soft-tissue anaesthesia — though it is not indicated under age 3 or under 15 kg. And always counsel the parent explicitly about lip, cheek and tongue biting before the child leaves.

Permanent page for this question

Practice patient cases Pediatric Dentistry study notes